As I explained in my article about bush turkeys, they are pesky creatures who, once they start building a nest in your back yard, are very hard to get rid of. That analogy couldn’t have been more true about Kevin Annett- despite the fact that the vast majority of people have seen through his deception- he just keeps on trying…
A friend posted a link on my Facebook page a couple of days ago of Annett doing an interview with the Truther Girls last week. It would have been funny, had it not been so say- listening to Annett continue shovelling his manure can be rather depressing at times. But, as comedic relief, Annett does make a number of humorous misstatements:
1. “We Are Establishing de Jure Courts”
Annett’s use of the phrase de Jure is good for a laugh. De Jure means “legitimate”- so, what he’s saying is that he’s creating legitimate courts by the virtue of saying they are legitimate. The problem is that they aren’t- one can’t create their own court. Well, one could, but it would be a kangaroo court- and this pretty much nullifies the use of the word de jure. Basically, this whole statement of his is beyond stupid…
2. “They are acting under an order from the Vatican, it’s a law called Crimen Sollicitationis under Canon Law”
Once again Kevin has got something so wrong it is laughable. Crimen sollicitationis is a document that was created by the Vatican in 1962. But, the Vatican is no longer operating under this document- in fact, it was nullified on May 18th, 2001. Currently, the Catholic Church operates under a document titled “Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela”. So, sorry Kevin, you are exposing your ignorance when you say this…
3. “This is not a mock trial…We are setting up, under common law power…”
There are two primary types of law- Common Law & Statute Law. Common law refers to the laws that are more or less “that’s the way it has always been done.” Common law relies upon the body of history and prior cases to establish what the rules are, one of the reasons lawyers study past cases so much. Statute law refers to the laws that have been passed by the legislature and have been written down and ‘codified’ for use.
Annett says he is conducting a criminal case, Criminal Law is codified into Statute Law, and is not related to Common Law. So, when Annett says his tribunals are not”mock trials” but they are, but virtue of the fact that tribunals are, in Canada, creatures of statute only. So, basically, what Annett is saying here, is circular nonsense.
4. “We are creating Peace officers”
Once again, Annett contradicts himself here. Peace Officers are, in Canada, defined under Statute Law and not under Common Law.
5. “We are going to conduct citizen arrests”
Section 494 of the Criminal Code outlines the circumstances where a citizen may make a citizens arrest. One is ONLY able to do it if one catches a criminal IN THE ACT of committing an indictable offense. So, once more, this is complete nonsense. If anyone actually takes Annett’s advice on citizen arrests they would find themselves charged with a crime.
Annett claims that he has a “highly experienced” legal team working with him- this is obviously a lie. Because, if he actually had qualified and experienced lawyers, they would have immediately corrected him on what he has been saying. I know, as I’ve run the information in this article past a couple of lawyers, and they both agree with me on all of these points.
Kevin’s statements are continually proven to be so wrong they are ludicrous. I proved that while he was lying about filing an (impossible to file) court case in Toronto. He proved this himself after claiming, with absolute confidence, that he found human bones at the Six Nations reserve (they turned out to be animal.) There are so many examples of how Annett is lying that it is hard to keep up with all of them in fact.
If you are someone who is still supporting this guy, you need to think long and hard about what you are doing. The longer you support Annett, the less likely it will look like you are an innocent person who was fooled, and the more likely it is you will be seen as a co-conspirator. The consequences of this could have a serious impact on your life- perhaps to the point of losing your freedom…
And, a special note to Alfred Webre. You have no excuse to be standing behind this nonsense- you’re a lawyer, remember? As it stands, until you take action to separate yourself from Kevin Annett’s deception, you are a de facto co-conspirator…