When Kinder Morgan Served Protesters With $5.8 Million Lawsuit Their Response Was a Laugh Riot! (Feat. Stephen Collis)

Nutty Professor Stephen Collis at the protest site...

Nutty Professor Stephen Collis at the protest site…

Earlier this year a small group of anti-pipeline protesters kicked off a series of direct action protests in Burnaby BC. Their first high-profile action happened in May when three of them locked their necks to the front gate of Chevron’s refinery “in solidarity” with the anarchist/native led Unist’ot’en action camp. One of he protesters was already known to this website, Dan Wallace had openly promoted violence against the police at this year’s May Day march. The other was Mia Nissen- a deluded character who’d previously compared herself to Gandhi after announcing plans to start a “hunger strike” (which was really a 7 day fast).

The protest was shut down after Chevron successfully applied for an injunction. Curiously, the RCMP allowed the protesters to walk away without facing any charges. Like any crime victim who’s watched the perpetrator set free, it appears that Chevron was disappointed- in August, they decided to take their own action to pursue justice through the courts.

Wallace and Nissen were back in the spotlight in August when, demonstrating a shocking lack of originality, they locked their necks to the front gate of a Kinder Morgan facility; this time joined by a young man named Adam Gold. Protesters have been bird-dogging Kinder Morgan staff ever since- often swearing at them and yelling insults as they tried to do their jobs. Like Chevron was in August, it appears that Kinder Morgan has finally had enough- they responded yesterday serving protesters with a $5.6 million lawsuit.

Documents filed with the court list six defendants

  • Adam Gold is a young man who originally comes from Bella Bella, BC. His Facebook friends list includes a number of high-profile union/NGO connected militants including Harsha Walia, Anushka Nagji, and Brigette DePape.
  • Mia Nissen is a graduate student at Simon Fraser University.
  • Stephen Collis is an SFU English professor, and a long time participant in Vancouver’s militant community. He’s is vocal supporter of the doctrine of Diversity of Tactics (meaning, it’s okay for fellow protesters to use violence). Collis has taken a high-profile position in this protest, often making media appearances on their behalf. Collis was an equally high-profile member of Occupy Vancouver (and appeared with Your Humble Narrator on CBC The National’s segment about Occupy’s one year anniversary).
  • Lynne Quarmby is a professor at Simon Fraser University’s department of molecular biology and biochemistry.
  • Alan Dutton is listed on the complaint “in his personal capacity as a representative of Burnaby Residents Opposing Kinder Morgan Expansion (BROKE is a small group started by 20 local residents, they’ve received funding from West Coast Environmental Law). Dutton is a prominent anti-racism activist whose biography labels as an expert on anti-democratic movements and right wing extremism. Considering the company he keeps, he no doubt also has expertise in left wing extremism.
  • John Doe, Jane Doe and Persons Unknown: Meaning, there’s a potential other defendants may be named in the future.

As often observed in protester friendly publications, an article published today in the Vancouver Observer (reader beware) only tells half of the story. Introducing the defendants as people “who have spoken out against the company’s pipeline test work” (they did a whole lot more than speak out), they next quoted Stephen Collis claiming:

“I feel outraged politically that this could happen in a democracy – that a massive foreign company can accuse you of trespassing on a park. That they can use the courts and their money and influence from barring you from your constitutional right to free speech”

There are a lot of things wrong with this statement, obvious problems that an objective journalist might question. Let’s start with Collis’ bogus (or, perhaps just stupid?) claim to be outraged “that this could happen in a democracy”. Canada’s has a democratically elected government and Kinder Morgan was operating entirely within the law. If democracy was assaulted, it happened the moment a small handful of people deputised themselves as agents above the law. The only constitutional rights that may have been breeched were Kinder Morgan’s right to conduct their work without interference.

One thing that Collis (and the Observer) doesn’t tell us is that the protesters have been accused of more than just trespassing. There are six other charges including assault, intimidation, nuisance, inducing breech of contract, and conspiracy.

That’s quite the list of charges, what have the protesters been doing up there on Burnaby Mountain?

So, What Rights Do Protesters Really Have?

It’s prudent to begin this conversation acknowledging that the protesters are entirely cognizant their rights weren’t actually being violated- this is far from being Stephen Collis’ first rodeo, he’s gone through this process more than once in the past. We should blame the idiocy of the good professor’s claims on the ghost of Saul Alinsky. Collis’ framing of Kinder Morgan as an evil, foreign, rights violating leviathan comes straight out of the book- rule twelve in Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals states: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it”.

The defendants had every right to protest, and have every right to voice their complaints- there’s no evidence these rights had been violated. As already mentioned, what they don’t have the right to do is impede the rights of others. But don’t take my word for it, BC courts have covered this issue ad-nauseum.

Kinder Morgan’s court filing quotes four instances of case law that make it clear the protesters were operating outside of their rights. The decision is ultimately up to the courts to decide, but the previous decisions seem pretty clear- and, we have video of the protesters engaging in exactly the same behaviour.


 A Small Bit Of Advice For Kinder Morgan:


One last thing stuck-out when reading through Kinder Morgan’s filing. It comes from section 24 of Part III where their lawyers summarize their case for why the court should approve the injunction. Their lawyers stated in parts “a” and “d” that the protesters were aware of the fact they were committing an offence and knew this made them subject to being arrested.

Despite the utter bullshit Stephen Collis shovelled to us through the Vancouver Observer, it’s virtually unimaginable the protesters weren’t smart enough to realize this. It’s likely the people at Kinder Morgan have already compiled evidence to back these statements, but if they’re in need of more, they should definitely check out this video- it’s chock-full of incriminating information.

When asked about what the protester’s goals are (at 1:50), Collis makes little effort to cover his tracks:

“The aim is to not allow this pipeline project to go ahead whatsoever.”

Then (at 2:10) he states:

“In some ways our role has become a delay tactic. How can we slow them down?”

Finally (at 2:15) one of the protesters is caught on video explaining:

“They still have to go another step and get an enforcement order in order to start arresting people, but that’s pretty quick, they could probably do that in a half a day”

Case closed, the protesters knew exactly what they were stepping into…

Permanent link to this article: http://www.genuinewitty.com/2014/10/31/kinder-morgan-protesters-served-5-8-million-lawsuit-their-response-was-a-laugh-riot-feat-stephen-collis/


Skip to comment form

  1. These malice aforethought lawbreakers who conspire to use violence in their protests ought to be dealt with by the full force of rifle butts applied to their collective jaw. If the butt stroke doesn’t suffice to enforce an order of the court, then perhaps a well placed bayonet thrust delivered by infantry of a law-abiding society will do so. It’s time to get tough with violent scofflaws – really tough.

    1. Bill, I see you spent time in uniform :-). . Yes, we call what you described as ” slash bash “. A rather effective way to quickly dispense with the enemy. Or unwanted radicals.

    • Allan L on November 1, 2014 at 12:10
    • Reply

    I hope the “protesters” get taken for every dollar they have. I hope they lose their homes, their bank accounts and the future bank accounts of their children.

    1. Alan, my thoughts exactly .

    2. fuck you central bankers my parents worked there whole lives dont have a house you guys destroy the environment illegally mind you and so we stand up for whats right and you want us to lose our homes LMAO FU ANARCHY

      1. What does this have to do with central banks? Lol

  2. Greg, we always play nice. That’s we don’t have criminal records, why we don’t smash things, why we can use big and intellectual sounding words and know what they mean, why we are skilled in the art of bathing and showering, why we have perfected the art of laundry, and lastly, why we can go to public events and do so sans gangsta or anarchist facial coverings.

    • Fritz Becker on November 4, 2014 at 01:45
    • Reply

    In spite of what and whom these anti Kinder Morgan protesters purport to represent, there really does not seem to be a groundswell of opposition from the public at large. Whilst not quite the same as the Line 9 reversal, in that new construction will be taking place, the route of this pipeline will be following much the same route as the original Trans-Mountain pipeline that has been in operation, without incident, since the late 1950s. What’s more the protestors decided to make their stand on Burnaby mountain, the site of the home campus of Simon Frazer University. So apparently it was alright for the WAC Bennett government to have Simon Frazer built on Burnaby mountain, which furnishes these two excuses for educators with employment, and permanently alter the landscape, but making a small track across Burnaby Mountain for a pipeline is verboten? So there is a precedent for construction on Burnaby Mountain, there is a precedent for building an oil pipeline across the mountains to the lower mainland, and there are a number of other precedents that the protestors will find out about at their day in court.

  3. Given that more than 70% of the gasoline consumed in the Lower Mainland originates (either in crude or finished product form) via KM’s Trans Mountain pipeline, a tactic that might help Kinder Morgan get the point across would be just to shut it down for 2-3 months for “maintenance” (wink-wink).

    A few weeks later, when gas starts costing $10 / litre (if you can find it), and people will require ration cards to get a stale loaf of bread, tenured SFU poetry perfesser Collis may find himself strung up from a lamp post, courtesy of his ungrateful fellow citizens who have no appreciation of his unsolicited “care-taking”. He’ll have a sign pinned to him reading,

    “Who Run Barter Town?”

      • Fritz Becker on November 7, 2014 at 23:38
      • Reply

      But why make the economy of Southern B.C victim just to discredit an loony professor, and maybe a dozen protesters, many of which are paid professionals, when they have little to no public support in this anyhow? They could not do it even if they wanted to, whilst Kinder Morgan owns and operates the Trans-Mountain Pipeline they are under contract by other companies to deliver the product.
      It has been said, even in the NDP’s post election review, that a position against twinning this pipeline may have helped cost the B.C NDP, and Adrian Dix, the election. I say helped, since undoubtedly there were other mitigating factors, such as his role as chief of staff under the other infamous Premier named Clark. But the NDP’s hostlie stance against resource industries, in a province built around resource industries overall, was a major factor.

    • Anne on November 7, 2014 at 20:36
    • Reply

    The delay tactics, increasing costs, engaging FN’s and right down to our favourite celeb Leo is all in here. The Tides strategy report. Long term goal, shut down the oil sands. http://www.offsettingresistance.ca/TarSandsCoalition-StrategyPaper2008.pdf

    1. That’s an interesting link you’ve shared, one I’ll be writing about in the near future – all is not as it appears on the surface…

    • Fritz Becker on November 7, 2014 at 23:41
    • Reply

    Hence why the $5.6 million dollar law suit filed by Kinder-Morgan was a prudent move. The Tides foundation launders money to radical environmentalist groups, and professional protestors, that literally make their living at the expense of legitimate resource enterprises, so why not seek restitution?

    1. Just wait until Part I of Kinder Morgan Protest Unmasked! Many of our favourite NGOs are hiding behind the curtains…

    • Dave Shirlaw on November 8, 2014 at 00:02
    • Reply

    I complained to RCMP about not adhering to rule of law. I asked Colllis if he was refunding salary to taxpayers and he said, “send bill to Kinder Morgan.”

    1. That sounds like typical Collis, the guy is a laugh a minute!

What's your opinion?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: