Okay, so it has already been proven that Kevin Annett & Jason Bowman are lying about having filed a court case. So, what was their response? Well, they decided to ignore this evidence and try to laugh-off the fact that they had been busted. Nice try guys, but no cigar- the onus of evidence is on you now to prove what you are saying.
In the worst retort on-record, these clowns decided that they could prove they had filed a court case by publishing the documents I’ve attached at the bottom of this article. The documents were published on Alfred Webre’s web page a couple of days ago.
Not only is this not proof, but it kind of makes a mockery out of Jason Bowman’s statements that he has “good legal advice”. It also makes me wonder about Webre’s legal skills- because not only are the documents complete gobbledegook, but they are missing some important things you’d expect to see in a legal filing. These documents are so wacky that they could have been put together by the Keystone Lawyers (close relatives of the Keystone Cops).
I was hesitating, at first, to point out all of the inaccuracies and mistakes in these documents- as it might help them with a future attempt. That said, they have stated that they’ve filed these documents in court. So, if there are any major changes, it will be further evidence that they were not telling the truth.
And so, to the analysis!
1.) Nothing was filed.
In the video when I went to the clerk of the court she looked-up both Kevin Annett & Jason Bowman’s names in the computer and there was no record of any case bring filed. As she very clearly stated, if a case is filed in a court, it is always in the computer. This point alone makes the rest of the article moot.
2.) The Court filing numbers & stamps are missing.
These documents have no court filing numbers, and have not been stamped by the clerk of the court. This is always done at the moment that the case has been filed- without exception. So, that Annett has released these documents to the public, without a stamp and a filing number, is absolutely meaningless towards proving they were filed. (which they weren’t)
3.) These aren’t the documents that need to be filed.
You can’t have a motion without either a statement of claim or an application first being filed because without them there’s nothing to have a motion on. So, basically, had they actually tried to file these documents (which they didn’t) they would have been immediately rejected.
4.) There’s no action/resolution called for.
If you are going to bake a cake you need to have some flour. If you are going to file a court case, you need to state what you are asking for as a resolution. For example, they could ask for $10 million in damages. Read these documents and you will realize that they have totally omitted this essential part of any court case. Just like the last case Annett claims to have been a part of, this would have been rejected for this reason.
5.) The filing failed to provide material facts to support it.
If you are going to accuse someone of a crime, you must state what that crime is. These documents are exactly like the last case Annett claims to have been a part of that were rejected for exactly this reason.
6.) Kevin Annett & Jason Bowman are listed as representative plantiffs.
Neither Annett of Bowman have ever attended a residential school, nor do they have any family members that did. In fact, Bowman is claiming to be the ‘prosecutor’, not a plaintiff. So, they should not be listed as plaintiffs.
Here are the documents- enjoy!