MediaWatch:, Media Co-Op & Kevin Annett’s (Continuing) Abuse Of Indigenous Communities…

Media Co-Op’s Megan Kinch throws softballs at Kevin Annett!

After APTN’s broadcast last week, Kevin Annett’s career as a fraud is pretty-much over now. They did an excellent piece on Annett, exposed many of his lies, and interviewed some of his victims. I helped with this story- sharing my research with APTN’s Todd Lamirande back in July. My favourite part of the story was when Frank Miller explained how the bones that Annett said he “discovered” smelled like rotting flesh- despite the fact they were supposed to be over 50 years old. Annett is a very sick man.

It took a very long time for people from the Toronto Media Co-Op (TMC) and to accept the fact Annett is a con-artist. This is probably because of embarrassment- both publications promoted Annett’s cause in the past. But, now that the truth is out there, it appears that people from both publications have been back-peddling. That said, neither have published a retraction- that would be the honourable thing to do, so we shouldn’t expect it from them…, founded by Judy Rebick has a significant amount of information promoting Annett on their website. Is this is a curious coincidence? I ask that because Rebick promoted Annett’s book last year. Her close colleague at Ryerson University, Winnie Ng did too. I posted a video of Ryerson’s Lynn Lavallee reading a letter singing praise over Annett’s ‘work’.

Rabble’s Krystalline Kraus (who is close with Rebick) was also involved in promoting Annett’s scam. She published an article promoting Annett’s book signing- the article was full of (obviously unresearched) praise. If you still have doubts about Kraus’ lack of professionalism- the following line from her article says it all:

“Last April he performed an exorcism rite in St. Peter’s Square, which was followed 12 hours later by a tornado – almost unprecedented in that time and place – which devastated central Rome and the Vatican.”

 Yep, Kraus actually published an article in Rabble stating that Annett performed an exorcism that caused damage to the Vatican! You can’t make this kind of stuff up folks…

TMC’s coverage wasn’t much better but, at least, they avoided discussing magical exorcisms- still, it was pretty dismal. Their reporter, Megan Kinch, interviewed Annett when he came to Occupy Toronto. Despite the fact he was walking around waving bones around in his hands (vital evidence if the story was true) completely bypassed her ‘journalistic’ radar. Rather than question him on how it was both disrespectful and reckless for Annett to be waving around the bones, she instead threw softball questions at him- not one single critical question was asked.

Kevin Annett was a topic of discussion on the Occupy/Decolonize Toronto Facebook page on Sunday. It was an interesting conversation- the truth has been exposed, and the rats are busy trying to scurry off of the ship. The problem is that they only seem to be further exposing themselves.

Darryl Richardson of TMC made the first interesting comment- apparently, he claims to be the person who invited Annett to speak at Occupy Toronto:


Interesting, isn’t it? What sort of a ‘journalist’ would listen to someone tell a story like this without their bullshit meter going off on full? A reporter for TMC obviously…

When an Occupier asked Richardson why he didn’t react to Annett recklessly waving around the bones when he came to Occupy Toronto, his answer was a total laugh-riot:

Considering how Darryl and TMC both claim to be knowledgeable and supporting of indigenous people, his answer is beyond ridiculous- most people I know who read this feel that Richardson was trying to weasel out of a tight space. Because, what sort of a journalist would think this way? Didn’t Richardson watch Poltergeist? If he did, he’d understand that indigenous people are very serious about respecting the bones of their ancestors.

Also, any journalist worth their salt would later call the women at Kanata and ask them if waving around the bones was acceptable- wouldn’t they? Personally, the moment I saw that video, I took my findings to an indigenous woman who was involved- that’s part of what got the ball rolling to get Annett kicked out of Kanata. But, obviously, respecting the memories of lost children wasn’t so important to Richardson.

Krystalline Kraus joined the conversation with an equally revealing set of posts:

Okay, so on the surface, it seems that Kraus had a more sensible reaction to Annett waving around the bones. That said, what she is saying doesn’t calculate. If she thought that Annett was “waving around the bones like a crazy man” then why didn’t she say something? And, considering she self-identifies as an “intrepid reporter”, why didn’t she dig into the issue later and write a story about this abuse?

Also notice how she starts trying to steer the conversation to lower the pressure on Richardson saying “Did you feel pressured?”. I have the same question for Kraus- did she feel pressured not to expose the fraud in fear of upsetting Judy Rebick?

Next, Richardson chimes in with another very revealing statement- it seems he may have trapped himself in a lie:

This is interesting on several issues. First, after I edited and re-published this video on YouTube, Richardson claimed to be the copyright owner and filed a complaint with them against me. So, was Richardson lying to YouTube? Well, perhaps not… re-published the audio track of the video on December 28, 2011 (long after Kraus stated she thought something was wrong with Annett). In it, Dan Kellar (of Alex Hundert’s violent anarchist group AW@L) states that Richardson did, indeed, film the video. So, which is it? We’ll probably never know- either way, it’s all very telling of the quality of reporting one finds with Rabble and TMC. Caveat lector

So, were Rabble & TMC part of the problem? I’d say so- both gave enthusiastic support to Kevin Annett’s fraud, both had reporters who saw (in-person) Annett irresponsibly waving the bones around, and both totally neglected to investigate afterwards. This is rather embarrassing, don’t you think?

But, it’s over now, so who cares- right?

Well, it isn’t quite over. First, Annett’s fraud is still creating great division with the people of the Six Nations- there are still people there who believe that Annett was telling the truth. And, next, Annett is still conning people off of the reserve- he’s still regularly broadcasting videos and lying about the situation. And, just last week, Annett’s partner announced this story was true on a Global TV broadcast on PressTV.

If you search TMC on Google, you will still find 85 pages that cover Kevin Annett. And, if you search, you will find a whopping 675 results. Annett is still at-large, telling his lies to people- the fact that all these links exist (without any retractions) is only helping him further his fraud.

This is a disgrace. Considering how much damage Annett has done to indigenous communities- why haven’t they written a retraction yet? Isn’t it important to them to protect others from Annett. Both Rabble and TMC claim to be advocates for Canada’s indigenous people- but, from their response to the Annett affair, it appears to me that it is more important to them to ‘save face’ than to protect the people who they claim to support.

Canadian indigenous people should pay attention to what’s happening here. It seems to me that Rabble & TMC aren’t necessarily working on their behalf- rather, they appear to be happy that Annett has caused all of this division in Kanata. Perhaps I’m wrong about this- but, their lack of a retraction is rather troubling…

Permanent link to this article:


Skip to comment form

    • The Hammer on October 18, 2012 at 07:41
    • Reply

    TMC and Rabble are examples of true bias in reporting. Often people mistake point of view for bias. They are not the same thing. These people are so biased in their opinion when someone like Kevin Annett comes along they want to beleive him. They actually want what he says to be true–that the government murdered dozens of native children 50 years ago and buried them in a mass grave.

    Even if they know what Kevin Annett says is not true they report it as fact anyway. They think the greater good is served by making people think this actually happened.

    In the end Rabble and TMC are no different from fascist new organizations like PressTV.

    • The Hammer on October 18, 2012 at 07:58
    • Reply

    Excellent video. Some favorite of my favorite parts:
    -When a biological anthropologist said “Knee socket is not a term we use” then went on to explain Kevin had either goat or cow bones
    -When the host proved Annett’s numbers make no sense
    -That Annett’s “grave site” was in a drainage ditch down stream from a former butcher shop

    At least one good thing has come from this. The TRC and 6 Nations have a learned a lot from their experiences with Kevin Annett.

    • brotherwolf1 on October 18, 2012 at 08:52
    • Reply

    ” … TMC and Rabble are examples of true bias in reporting … ” Correction, with respect . NO, they are examples of how NOT to report and what not to do when making claims to being a journalist.

  1. Krystalline Kraus (KKK) is also continuing to exploit indigenous communities. Some results are visible in this post:

    Dave Courchene and others need to realize if they ‘share’ traditions with members of the dominant culture, they create monsters like Krystalline.

    I understand she’s claiming to be Samii now with some wacked out fantastical family history. That was not always the case –

    “anyway, after a good dose of good old american justice, Jerry Springer plays at 3pm. nothing like a little white trash for desert (yes, is said ‘white trash’, i’m allowed to make fun of myself and my family because the Kraus c(k)lan is about as while trash as it gets). thank god i’m pretty hoped up on percocets by 3pm, so I’m pretty much numb to bad TV or my brain would rot. ”

    In her very own words, the Kraus Klan is about as white trash as it gets. She and her appropriative behavior needs to be stop and the ones enabling this appropriation need to take responsibility for the results of their actions.

What's your opinion?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.